<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Matthew Daley on Aura Research Division</title><link>https://research.aurainfosec.io/authors/matthew-daley/</link><description>Recent content in Matthew Daley on Aura Research Division</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Aura Information Security © 2026</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://research.aurainfosec.io/authors/matthew-daley/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Not So Strict Transport Security</title><link>https://research.aurainfosec.io/pentest/not-so-strict-transport-security/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://research.aurainfosec.io/pentest/not-so-strict-transport-security/</guid><description>Your Strict Transport Security policy may not be as strict as you think. A common misconfiguration can lead to a suprising amount of plaintext leakage.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://research.aurainfosec.io/pentest/not-so-strict-transport-security/featured.png"/></item></channel></rss>